Insights: Publications 4 Key Takeaways | The Governance of Innovation: Managing New AI, IP, and Regulatory Frameworks
Kilpatrick’s Starling Underwood recently presented on the topic of “The Governance of Innovation: Managing New AI, IP, and Regulatory Frameworks” at the firm’s annual “Ethics, Professional Well-Being, and Technology Seminar.” He joined fellow thought leader Keith Robinson, Associate Dean of Research, Professor of Law at Wake Forest University, as part of the presentation.
Starling’s key takeaways from the discussion include:
1. AI Demands Systemic Management, Not Routine Control
AI systems are fundamentally different from traditional legal tools. These systems are probabilistic and dynamic, evolving over time. Legal professionals must move from simply “controlling” tools to managing complex, changing systems that require constant oversight and adjustment.
2. AI Introduces Diverse and Significant Risks
AI brings a range of risks: legal (such as regulatory non-compliance and discrimination), operational (like system failures and model drift), privacy, security, business, and even environmental. Organizations must systematically map, measure, and manage these risks associated with AI usage.
3. Human Oversight and Accountability Are Non-Negotiable
AI should never operate without meaningful human oversight and clear lines of responsibility. Humans must be accountable for critical decisions to ensure ethical practice and legal defensibility.
4. Culture Is the Ultimate Safeguard for Responsible AI
A culture of responsible AI use is essential. Organizations should provide ongoing training, recognize and reward responsible behavior, and build trust with stakeholders and customers.
For more information, please contact:
Starling Underwood, sunderwood@ktslaw.com.
Related People
Related Industries
Disclaimer
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.
